As I mentioned earlier this fall, back in September I enrolled in a college course to test the waters to see if the time (mostly, if I had the time) was right to take the plunge back into academia. Though I only made my way through one course (finishing up this week), I did find a need to reassess my time management skills. Between working full-time and going back to school, while also being an active parent (and having a “honey-do list”), there’s definitely some juggling going on. Despite my struggles to find that balance, and only after a month and a half into the trial period, I went ahead and applied for a program. As many who follow me on Facebook and Twitter already know, as of Wednesday I was accepted to the Writing and Rhetoric PhD program at George Mason University.
While some folks might be asking, “why not history?”, there are a number of reasons why I didn’t take that avenue, and at the top of that list, I feel, is field saturation.
Sure, I love history, but… I’m more interested in the ways in which it can be delivered. For anyone who followed this blog (and can remember), as far back as 2008, I expressed various interests in the delivery of history via the Web back then. In short, history remains my content of interest, while “Writing and Rhetoric” is my greater interest, being a means by which the content can be “electrified”. Though I throw out this word, “electrified”, I don’t think many folks understand…
“Sooooo, you want to teach college students how to write history?”
Yes, but… no. I’m interested in how to 1) teach students to write, 2) how to write humanities, 3) how to write humanities in the digital space… effectively.
“So, the ‘digital space’? You mean writing on the Web, using hyperlinks? Like… writing the same stuff on paper, just putting it on the Web with hyperlinks?”
Yes… writing and communicating on the Web… and in other digital venues, but no… not simply a matter of writing for the Web as if writing for print; and as far as hyperlinks go… well, that doesn’t begin to tap into the potential of the digital space.
Here’s the thing, when you hear “Writing and Rhetoric” are you still stuck in what that meant in… oh, say… the mid-latter 20th century, or are you forward-thinking, as to what it means and has potential yet to mean, in the 21st century; most especially when considering the Web (to include social media) and other possibilities? Consider, for example, augmented reality…
I know… there are people out there saying to themselves… “whhhhat?” I’ll get back to that at a later point.
All that said, here’s a catch (at least I think)… what about rhetoric and its part in that more dynamic, 21st century meaning in “writing”?
To be honest, I’m troubled by how history has been given political spin… right and left being equally annoying. To this end, I’ve been looking into the rhetoric of teaching objectivity (which, in itself, is not to be considered neutral, by the way).
Confused yet… or intrigued?
Anyway, I officially launch on this new journey in the next semester. I look forward to immersing myself in the philosophy and the possibilities. I’m also sure some of it will spill over into this blog, in addition to historical content.
So, yes… back to college at 50. It seems incredible to think that I started my journey in academia, 32 years ago this fall. Now, seven universities later… it’s time for that PhD.
Dale Fishel
December 6, 2015
More power to you. Having stuck one hairy two in these waters at age 70 (about 6 yrs ago) I have a little bit of empathy for your undertaking. I also admire your phrasing (above) “looking into the rhetoric of teaching objectivity”. Objectivity in its purest form is certainly generally absent from contemporary “news” broadcasting…I catch myself begging various sources to just give me the facts!
Robert Moore
December 6, 2015
Thanks, Dale!
Rich Gillespie
December 6, 2015
I’ll be very interested in what your thoughts are to this as you proceed, working for the Mosby Heritage Area Association as I do . . . Please continue to follow up . . .
Robert Moore
December 6, 2015
Will do, Rich. Thanks.
Richard Williams
December 7, 2015
Congratulations Robert and best wishes for success! I look forward to addressing you as “Dr. Moore.” Be sure and stake out your safe place right away.
Robert Moore
December 7, 2015
Thanks, Richard!
Jimmy Dick
December 8, 2015
Congratulations and the best of good fortune to you in the endeavor. You are not kidding about the saturation of Ph.D level historians. There just are not enough academic slots for them to take right now which means they’re arriving on community college campuses as well as spreading their inability to teach effectively over a wider range in higher ed.
I opted for an Ed.D because of the saturation level. The academic field needs more historians who can actually educate students instead of lecturing non-stop. Communication is key to this and I think what you are doing is just as important if not more so. What good is all of the historical research if it cannot reach the larger audience?
Robert Moore
December 8, 2015
Thanks, Jimmy.
David T. Dixon
January 12, 2016
Robert: Congratulations on your new adventure. Went back to get my M.A. in history in my forties and it was a wonderful experience. I was a big fan of your Southern Unionist Chronicles. Shame on me for never contributing. As restitution, I would like to mail you a complementary copy of my new book, It is essentially a biography of a long forgotten Southern Union man and his adventures during the CW. I think you will find it interesting in that regard and an enjoyable read. Just email me your mailing address and i will pop a copy in the mail. No strings attached. davedixonhistory@gmail.com. Best of luck to you!
Robert Moore
January 13, 2016
Thanks, David! I’d appreciate that! I’ll contact you via email to give you my address.