Keying off of both Kevin Levin’s and Brooks Simpson’s posts on Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell’s proclamation (an annual proclamation from the Governor’s office for a number of years back) about Confederate History Month (this year’s is actually modified slightly from last year’s proclamation), I felt the need to toss in a few comments of my own. Frankly, it shouldn’t be surprising when it comes to politicians dabbling in history. In recent years, however, it seems almost status quo for politicians to either re-purpose history, or stumble over it (Democrat and Republican alike), thinking that they are doing some service to the general populace… or a specific element within the population. So, it’s not that McDonnell had an historical-related hiccup, it’s just that his office, in carrying-on the trend, continues to present what amounts to… “not-so-much the whole history” of the Confederacy in relation to Virginia’s people. Most certainly, it’s not the history of the people of Virginia in the Civil War/War Between the States/or any other way one wishes to phrase it.
I’m a Virginian with the many family lines going back to European settlement here. Various descendants of those lines, by the way, stayed in Virginia or headed to points west and south… some eventually being in opposite armies by the time of the war. With the exception of my Kentucky and Maryland people (blue and gray in those lines as well), the majority (better than 75%) of my ancestors lived in Virginia at the time of the war. Many of my ancestors wore gray, but that doesn’t mean they loved the promise of the Confederacy. Some embraced the Confederacy and one literally recalled being on picket duty, starving, when word came of Lee’s surrender. I suspect that some joined Virginia regiments because of peer pressure in the community, but I will never know for sure, one way or the other. Some were conscripts, though service records do not reveal this. I also have Virginia Unionists, one who was regularly intimidated and even forced from his home at one point and subjected to abuse. I have leave-aloners, such as the one who regularly evaded Confederate conscript hunters and was eventually pressured to the point where he had enough, and joined the Union army… not because he was a Unionist, but because he was fed up. Then too, I have a Virginia-born relative who joined the Union army in 1861. I have Virginia people who died wearing gray and Virginia people who died wearing blue. All made sacrifices, and that’s easily understood, but “cause” is always much more difficult to ascertain.
That’s just one of the reasons why it’s obvious that Confederate History Month is too narrow in scope in regard to what is important for Virginians to recognize. It too easily serves as a dismissing “remembrance” activity, continuing to tuck away the complex truths about Virginia in the war. It’s convenient that while hurraying “our Confederate heritage”, we can so easily forget those Virginians who found it not so great; the disillusioned and disaffected, the Unionists and “leave-aloners”. What about those Virginians who walked on eggshells during this time, whites and blacks alike? Try living in a society in which you live under fear of harm or outright death if you wished to vote against secession. I don’t know how many accounts I have seen where Virginians were not able to voice their opinions and their devotion to the old Union without fear of violence, yet were just as passionate about what even they called “the sacred soil of Virginia.” How many “Virginia’s Confederates” were actually unwilling conscripts or were disaffected or disillusioned Confederates who were sometimes physically forced from their homes to either join or return to the ranks (and whose descendants continue to blindly praise these same people as “Confederate heroes”)? Whether free black, slave, white farm laborer, or whatever, Virginia’s Civil War heritage is defined by all of these people. Confederate History Month doesn’t perpetuate our understanding of this, but muddies the waters. That’s why Confederate History Month SHOULD be changed to Virginia Civil War Heritage Month, in order to identify the many different angles (including those who embraced the Confederacy) that define the reality that was Virginia at the time of the war. This IS the “Commonwealth’s shared history” and it IS important for all Virginians to recognize this.
Kevin
April 6, 2010
Thanks Robert. You nailed it.
Robert Moore
April 6, 2010
I particularly like this…
“April is the month in which the people of Virginia joined the Confederate States of America in a four year war between the states for independence”
So, let’s talk about how “the people of Virginia joined the Confederate States of America”; specifically, about how those in the secession convention were thrust into things a bit faster by the actions of Henry Wise and his Harpers Ferry/Norfolk mission planned behind Gov. Letcher’s back… and then how the government of the Commonwealth went to war BEFORE the referendum… those in high places didn’t wait for the final approval of the “people of Virginia”.
Harry Smeltzer
April 6, 2010
Thanks Robert – previous to your post, I was under the impression that this was the brain-child of this particular governor, but now see that he was following in the errant footsteps of his predecessors. It doesn’t excuse him, but does put things in perspective.
Robert Moore
April 6, 2010
I’d just like to see a Virginia governor really consider Virginia’s history and what it encompasses in relation to the war, not just one aspect of it. It’s obvious there is some tweaking going on because of the differences between last year’s proclamation and this year’s, but there’s more work to be done.
Kevin
April 6, 2010
Robert,
I agree. It really is disappointing given the great work that the Virginia Sesquicentennial commission has been doing to properly commemorate Virginia 150th Civil War Sesquicentennial. They’ve approached it by trying to uncover a more complete picture of the war where no one group is isolated from the other. Rather, the goal is to better understand the ways in which Virginians of various stripes responded as a people to the crisis. The governor’s proclamation is a step in the wrong direction.
Corey Meyer
April 7, 2010
Excellent post Robert.
Carrie Janney
April 7, 2010
Robert,
Nicely said.
cej
Robert Moore
April 7, 2010
Hi Carrie,
Thanks; hope all is well with you!
Robert
Meade
April 7, 2010
God Bless Bob McDonnell ! Im so proud of Virginia in being part of a bold historical moment to fight for the Second American Revolution. My ancestors were brave heroes and I raise my hat to General Lee- a true Christian man. He was the first to take communion with a black man in church. I believe that the war was a sad thing, but people fought for their country (i.e. Virginia), so it is only fitting that we honor and respect that as part of our noble heritage for freedom and independence!
Robert Moore
April 7, 2010
Almost as if on cue… thanks for helping to make my point.
*To satisfy another reader, let me make it a little more clear as to what I mean… the comment Meade made provides a real example of how overboard passion for Lost Cause can make us lose sight of the complexities that surround Virginians and their affiliation with the Confederacy. The same can be said for some who might get too lost in “Won Cause” as they pronounce that they are proud of their ancestors “fighting for the Union to free the slaves” (just as an example). Obviously, like those in gray, it’s also much more difficult to grasp the different reasons why men in blue fought and/or served. I have briefly mentioned (in some previous posts) how difficult things can be in identifying reasons for Marylanders in blue…
William Richardson
April 7, 2010
Actually Robert..He didn’t help you make your point and your response of “Almost as if on cue..” Was that the best response you could give ? It’s almost laughable….
Robert Moore
April 7, 2010
He gave an example of heritage over history. Our passion for history and historical persons has the potential to get the best of us. At that point, we have the potential to lose site of the complexities of history. Cheering-on Lee… that doesn’t really explain anything. I like Lee for several reasons too… and Jackson… and Grant… and Lincoln, but I know how to look at them for all they were, the good things and the flaws. Likewise, someone may cheer-on Virginians for committing to the “Second War for Independence”, but it’s a lot more to it than that.
Margaret D. Blough
April 8, 2010
Excellent!